苏里说话共有18篇文章被收藏推荐
鲜果类别：
文化.社会
鲜果标签：
读书
收录于2007-06-26
认领
报错
推荐
无巧不成书
世上有很多巧事儿，跟编的一样。
我下面讲的故事，是连续发生的，真人真事儿。
大约一个月前，与上海老友Y电话里谈起《科耶夫的新拉丁帝国》，谈到科耶夫上世纪三十年代在巴黎高师讲授黑格尔的《精神现象学》的景象，感慨国内那么多年，竟然没人专题研究黑格尔的这本书。
我们也太坐井观天了！放下电话，打开邮件，收到高全喜兄的来信，发来的大作中，竟然提到他多年前的博士论文，就是研究《精神现象学》的，且出版过。轰然间想起北大出版社2004年底出版过他的《论相互承认的法权》，副标题是“《精神现象学》研究两篇”。冲到楼下丛书专架，从“政治与法律思想论丛”中迅即抽出该书，一口气艰难地读了前言和首篇正文26个页码，已是凌晨三点多。（买来4年，竟未读一页。书就是这样，不知道什么风，会勾起对它的需要与渴望。）
上午起床，续读了30页。
中午给Y打电话，告诉他全喜的著作的消息，并闲聊了几句读后感。
不几日，Y来京，下飞机就赶到万圣，电脑查询，高著库存最后一册，遂买下。
我们正谈高著不几句，高全喜竟“突然”出现！他接受了我们对其大作的赞美，约好下次Y来京时，到他府上小酌几杯，顺便谈他的黑格尔研究和对科耶夫的批评。
几天后，电话里我问起Y读后感，他沮丧地跟我说，×他娘，见了鬼了，我明明把书带上了飞机，可回到家，怎么也找不到，这里肯定出了故事。
又几天，我途径上海，去南洵归来书院参加金观涛未出版新著《探索现代社会的起源》讨论会。到上海当天，午饭刚一落座，Y想起托我办的事儿，——恰好全喜兄也来与会，希望他从北京带两本《相互承认的法权》。我打电话给高，高答应。
第二天深夜，全喜抵南洵。次日会间茶歇，全喜神秘兮兮拿出书：不好意思，只带了一本，下次来我家，补上。Y粗嗓门冲着全喜说，苏里说了，只读首篇的前20页足够了，我×，哈哈哈……
南洵会结束，回上海的第二天，在四季酒店咖啡厅，Y说，全喜有感觉。我知道，这是Y较高评价当代学人作品的惯用语。
我们回北京的第二天，Y悄没声地尾随而来。他办完差事，给我打电话，说：我跟你说啊，奇了怪了。我昨天一上飞机，正是上次回去的同一航班，还是那个空姐，×他娘，你知道发生了什么事儿？我问那空姐，你们是不是捡到一本书？空姐毫不迟疑地说，‘绿皮儿的，对吧？你等等’。随后她找出书，说：‘按理，我们是要上交给公司的，但谁知鬼使神差，竟留在飞机上，你看看，是不是这一本？’×他娘，正是全喜的《相互承认的法权》！世上竟有这等怪事！×他姥姥！
第二天我们见面，一见面，俩人哈哈大笑，都心照不宣，笑全喜的书见了鬼，失而复得。
Y回上海当天，我们通了电话，他说，下次来京，一定找全喜喝上一杯，这小子确实“邪乎”，书写得“邪乎”，人也“邪乎”，写的书也“邪乎”，哈哈哈，×他娘地……
2008年12月
亨廷顿仙逝
一早收到台北钱永祥先生信，转来哈佛大学网站报道亨廷顿去世的消息，大为震惊！
也才81岁，勉强算作高龄。
向这位给与我无限教益的政治哲学家，致以敬意与深切哀悼！
将近三十年来，我一直读他的著作，从盗版的《变化世界中的政治秩序》、《第三波：二十世纪的民主化浪潮》、《我们是谁：美国国家特性面临的挑战》到《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》、《失衡的承诺》，从他主编的《文化的重要作用》、《全球化的文化动力》到英文版No Easy Choice:Political Participation in Developing Countries。
无缘与先生见面，只好托在哈佛大学的好友向他表示后学的感谢之情。
1987年前后，我与前妻尝试翻译的第一部英文著作，就是上面提到的《艰难的抉择：发展中国家的政治参与》。几经校对，拖到1989年，未获发表。十几年后，竟然在故纸堆里找到完整译稿，物往人非，我也鼓不起当年的勇气，再行修订，一放又是7年。
想起译稿，稍有心安。二十多年前，在二十几平米、终日难见阳关的小屋里，诞生了一部亨廷顿先生的中文译稿，跟我有关。
几年内，文明世界接连失去罗尔斯、诺齐克、亨廷顿，战后伟大的政治哲学时代，落幕了。
关于亨廷顿先生的详细文字，请大家阅读转自哈佛大学官方网站的长篇报道。
Samuel Huntington, 81, political scientist, scholar
'One of the most influential political scientists of the last 50 years'
By Corydon Ireland
Harvard News Office
Samuel P. Huntington - a longtime Harvard University professor, an influential political scientist, and mentor to a generation of scholars in widely divergent fields - died Dec. 24 on Martha's Vineyard. He was 81.
Huntington had retired from active teaching in 2007, following 58 years of scholarly service at Harvard. In a retirement letter to the President of Harvard, he wrote, in part, "It is difficult for me to imagine a more rewarding or enjoyable career than teaching here, particularly teaching undergraduates. I have valued every one of the years since 1949."
Huntington, the father of two grown sons, lived in Boston and on Martha's Vineyard. He was the author, co-author, or editor of 17 books and over 90 scholarly articles. His principal areas of research and teaching were American government, democratization, military politics, strategy, and civil-military relations, comparative politics, and political development.
"Sam was the kind of scholar that made Harvard a great university," said Huntington's friend of nearly six decades, economist Henry Rosovsky, who is Harvard's Lewis P. and Linda L. Geyser University Professor, Emeritus. "People all over the world studied and debated his ideas. I believe that he was clearly one of the most influential political scientists of the last 50 years."
"Every one of his books had an impact," said Rosovsky. "These have all become part of our vocabulary."
Jorge Dominguez, Harvard's vice provost for International Affairs, described Huntington as "one of the giants of political science worldwide during the past half century. He had a knack for asking the crucially important but often inconvenient question. He had the talent and skill to formulate analyses that stood the test of time."
Huntington's friend and colleague Robert Putnam, the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, called him "one of the giants of American intellectual life of the last half century."
To Harvard College Professor Stephen P. Rosen, Beton Michael Kaneb Professor of National Security and Military Affairs, "Samuel Huntington's brilliance was recognized by the academics and statesmen around the world who read his books. But he was loved by those who knew him well because he combined a fierce loyalty to his principles and friends with a happy eagerness to be confronted with sharp opposition to his own views."
Huntington, who graduated from Yale College at age 18 and who was teaching at Harvard by age 23, was best known for his views on the clash of civilizations. He argued that in a post-Cold War world, violent conflict would come not from ideological friction between nation states, but from cultural and religious differences among the world's major civilizations.
Huntington, who was the Albert J. Weatherhead III University Professor at Harvard, identified these major civilizations as Western (including the United States and Europe), Latin American, Islamic, African, Orthodox (with Russia as a core state), Hindu, Japanese, and "Sinic" (including China, Korea, and Vietnam).
"My argument remains," he said in a 2007 interview with Islamica Magazine, "that cultural identities, antagonisms and affiliations will not only play a role, but play a major role in relations between states."
Huntington first advanced his argument in an oft-cited 1993 article in the journal Foreign Affairs. He expanded the thesis into a book, "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order," which appeared in 1996, and has since been translated into 39 languages.
To the end of his life, the potential for conflict inherent in culture was prominent in Huntington's scholarly pursuits. In 2000, he was co-editor of "Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress." And just before his health declined, in the fall of 2005, he was beginning to explore religion and national identity.
"His contributions ranged across the whole field of political science, from the deeply theoretical to the intensely applied," said Putnam, author of a lengthy appreciation of Huntington in a 1986 issue of the journal PS: Political Science and Politics. "Over the years, he mentored a large share of America's leading strategic thinkers, and he built enduring institutions of intellectual excellence."
And Putnam added a personal note. "What was most rare about Sam, however, was his ability to combine intensely held, vigorously argued views with an engaging openness to contrary evidence and argument. Harvard has lost a towering figure, and his colleagues have lost a very good friend."
Timothy Colton, the Morris and Anna Feldberg Professor of Government and Russian Studies at Harvard, remarked on his old friend's breadth of intellectual interests. He used the American political experience as a pivot point (Huntington's doctoral dissertation was on the Interstate Commerce Commission), but soon deeply studied a globe-spanning range of topics.
"He was anchored in American life and his American identity, but he ended up addressing so many broad questions," said Colton, who had Huntington as a Ph.D. adviser at Harvard in the early 1970s. "His degree of openness to new topics and following questions where they take him is not as often found today as when he was making his way."
Huntington's first book, "The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations," published to great controversy in 1957 and now in its 15th printing, is today still considered a standard title on the topic of how military affairs intersect with the political realm. It was the subject of a West Point symposium last year, on the 50th anniversary of its publication.
In part, "Soldier and the State" was inspired by President Harry Truman's firing of Gen. Douglas MacArthur - and at the same time praised corps of officers that in history remained stable, professional, and politically neutral.
In 1964, he co-authored, with Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Political Power: USA-USSR," which was a major study of Cold War dynamics - and how the world could be shaped by two political philosophies locked in opposition to one another.
Brzezinski, a doctoral student at Harvard in the early 1950s who was befriended by both Huntington and Rosovsky, was U.S. National Security Adviser in the Carter White House from 1977 to 1981. In those days, said Rosovsky, the youthful Huntington, though an assistant professor, was often mistaken for an undergraduate.
According to his wife Nancy, Huntington was a life-long Democrat, and served as foreign policy adviser to Vice President Hubert Humphrey in his 1968 presidential campaign. In the wake of that "bitter" campaign, she said, Huntington and Warren Manshel - "political opponents in the campaign but close friends" - co-founded the quarterly journal Foreign Policy (now a bimonthly magazine). He was co-editor until 1977.
His 1969 book, "Political Order in Changing Societies," is widely regarded as a landmark analysis of political and economic development in the Third World. It was among Huntington's most influential books, and a frequently assigned text for graduate students investigating comparative politics, said Dominguez, who is also Antonio Madero Professor of Mexican and Latin American Politics and Economics. The book "challenged the orthodoxies of the 1960s in the field of development," he said. "Huntington showed that the lack of political order and authority were among the most serious debilities the world over. The degree of order, rather than the form of the political regime, mattered most."
His 1991 book, "The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century" - another highly influential work - won the Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order, and "looked at similar questions from a different perspective, namely, that the form of the political regime - democracy or dictatorship - did matter," said Dominguez. "The metaphor in his title referred to the cascade of dictator-toppling democracy-creating episodes that peopled the world from the mid 1970s to the early 1990s, and he gave persuasive reasons for this turn of events well before the fall of the Berlin Wall."
As early as the 1970s, Huntington warned against the risk of new governments becoming politically liberalized too rapidly. He proposed instead that governments prolong a transition to full democracy - a strand of ideas that began with an influential 1973 paper, "Approaches to Political Decompression."
Huntington's most recent book was "Who Are We? The Challenges of America's National Identity" (2004), a scholarly reflection on America's cultural sense of itself.
Samuel Phillips Huntington was born on April 18, 1927, in New York City. He was the son of Richard Thomas Huntington, an editor and publisher, and Dorothy Sanborn Phillips, a writer.
Huntington graduated from Stuyvesant High School, received his B.A. from Yale in 1946, served in the U.S. Army, earned an M.A. from the University of Chicago in 1948, and a Ph.D. from Harvard in 1951, where he had taught nearly without a break since 1950.
From 1959 to 1962, he was associate director of the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University. At Harvard, he served two tenures as the chair of the Government Department - from 1967 to 1969 and from 1970 to 1971.
Huntington served as president of the American Political Science Association from 1986 to 1987.
Huntington was director of Harvard's Center for International Affairs from 1978 to 1989. He founded the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, and was director there from 1989 to 1999. He was chairman of the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies from 1996 to 2004, and was succeeded by Jorge Dominguez.
Huntington applied his theoretical skills to the Washington, D.C., arena too. In 1977 and 1978, he served in the Carter White House as coordinator of security planning for the National Security Council. In the 1980s, he was a member of the Presidential Commission on Long-Term Integrated Strategy.
Huntington is survived by his wife of 51 years, Nancy Arkelyan Huntington; by his sons Nicholas Phillips Huntington of Newton, Mass. and Timothy Mayo Huntington of Boston; by his daughters-in-law Kelly Brown Huntington and Noelle Lally Huntington; and by his four grandchildren.
There will be a private family burial service on Martha's Vineyard, where Huntington summered for 40 years.
In the spring, there will be a memorial service at Harvard. Details are pending.
再见钟芳玲
电话里，钟芳玲小姐告诉我他第二次来京的具体时间，11月11日。
她人在美国。
她为新版《书店风景》而来。
新版（纪念版）书店风景，由近年崛起有为的中央编译社出版，今天上架，精装，超大16开，印制极其精美，定价还算合理，128.00元。
钟芳玲小姐来信说，在万圣的活动，13、14日均可。
我们期待着钟芳玲小姐到来，期待活动顺利举行。
钟小姐第一次来京，是2005年底，为广西师大出版社出版，她的新作《书天堂》读者见面会。
她走遍全世界的书店。中国开放27年，她第一次登陆，来京。
我问她，怎么才来？
她说，不知道大陆有什么书店。
我有些丧气。
但无法得出钟小姐无知的结论。
她亲口告诉我，万圣使她吃惊，相见恨晚。
她一口气参观了万圣的三家店，非常认真、敬业地跪在地上，拍了许多照片。
我很得意。为万圣，也为大陆的同行。
但我深知，比起历史更长，日子过得相对宽松的国外独立书店，大陆独立书店还有很大距离。
三年过去了，事事在变。包括国外的独立书店，也在变。国内的独立书店，日子好像更难熬了。
新版《书店风景》，告诉了读者许多新鲜故事，比如有名的书店歇业了。
钟芳玲小姐电话里跟我提起个人，美国“城市之光”（City Lights Books）总采购Paul Yamazaki先生，并从信中寄来她与Yamazaki的合影。Yamazaki是日裔美国人，生在美国，高高大大，很像我认识的澳大利亚中国学家戴维。钟小姐说，Yamazaki跟她盛赞万圣，并有小礼物托她带我。直到看到照片，我才想起Yamazaki，——今年初，作为国际独立书店参访团一员，他来到北京，访问了万圣，我们在一起聊了两个多小时，大大超出计划中的40分钟。
钟芳玲小姐的“相见恨晚”，在Yamazaki这里得到印证。Yamazaki说，万圣是中国独立书店当然的第一，一半出于客气——他毕竟所到之处有限，没有看到我好朋友们，志强、搏非、定方、薛野等的书店；一半属实。
《书店风景》，我和焕萍翻烂了两册，还藏有一册。此外，我们还有台湾天地版，和日月文化纪念版——都是兴文兄从台北背回北京的。这回有了中央编译版，《书店风景》中文版，我们几乎收齐了。此外，我们还有《书天堂》的台湾版和大陆版。钟芳玲小姐的书，在大陆，我们恐怕收的最齐了。
活动最后定在本月13号下午，具体时间另行通知。欢迎在京不在京能来的朋友们参加与钟小姐聊天会。当此时，备免费茶水，其他饮品自费。
“张广达文集”出版
刘按：广西师大出版社近日推出“张广达文集”，凡三种，《文书、典籍与西域史地》，《文本、图象与文化流传》，《史家、史学与现代学术》。可喜可贺。恰好几日前收到介绍张广达教授荣获中研院院士的消息，一并附上。
学渊评：原北京大学教授张广达先生当选中研院院士，是一九四九年后中国大陆得此殊荣之第一人，张广达先生人格高尚，博学多才，早年习中西交通史，一九五七年与向达先生等杰出学者‘出洞入瓮’受尽摧残；一九X九年后，张广达先生毅然脱离北京大学，立志于海外等待中国民主时代的到来。张先生是家姐学文女士的老师，亦是本‘学渊评’读者，且常予笔者以道义鼓励。张先生之当选，不仅是学术自由的胜利，而且是人格独立之榜样，吾等追求精神自由者皆与有荣焉。
中国大陆当选中研院院士第一人——张广达
声望卓著的台湾中央研究院新一届院士于周五傍晚选出。著名历史学家，在唐史、西域史、中外文化交流史等领域的研究享誉海内外的原北京大学历史系教授，曾任法兰西学院国际讲席教授的张广达，当选院士。张广达由此成为中国大陆当选中研院院士第一人。联合报今天以“张广达，中亚文化佼佼者”为题报道说，张广达是研究中亚文化史及中外文化交流的顶尖学者。研究中亚文化，包括古代地理文化交流、传播等，并研究不同国家的研究者，如何受国家和文化影响等。中研院院士许倬云说，张广达是世界上研究这方面的顶尖学者之一。
报道指出，张广达今年虽然是第一次提名，但他优异的表现深受肯定。因此第一次提名就得到当选。
据报道，中研院第二十七届院士昨天出炉，四十七位候选人中，有十九位当选。诺贝尔奖得主李远哲的胞弟李远鹏，第四度扣关终于当选。媒体评论说，李远鹏与大哥李远川，二哥李远哲共谱“一门三杰”的学术佳话。中央研究院一九二八年在南京成立。一九四九年迁移台湾，蔡元培、胡适、李远哲曾先后担任过院长。
本院宣布第二十七届新任院士名单
中华民国九十七年七月四日
本院于九十七年七月一日起连续4天召开第二十八次院士会议，并于七月四日顺利推选出第二十七届中央研究院新任院士共十九位。本院谨向新任院士当选人，虔诚致上敬意与祝贺。第二十七届中央研究院院士名单如后。
数理科学组（八人）：雷干城、黄煦涛、舒维都、杨祖保、李雄武、贺曾朴、伊 林、李远鹏
生命科学组（七人）：蔡立慧、锺正明、赵 华、蒋观德、沈正韵、林仁混、刘鸿文
人文及社会科学组（四人）：段锦泉、黄进兴、王 平、张广达
相关网址http://www.sinica.edu.tw/academician/2008.doc
张广达简介：
张广达，中国历史学家。一九三一年五月二十七日生于河北青县。一九五三年毕业于北京大学历史系历任北京大学讲师、副教授、教授、中国中古史研究中心副主任。现为北京大学历史系教授、北京大学中古史研究中心副主任、中国敦煌吐鲁番学会副秘书长、联合国教科文组织主持的《中亚文明史》中国编委、法国亚洲学会会员。《中国大百科全书·中国历史》编辑委员会委员、第七届全国政协委员。
张广达致力于唐史、西域史、敦煌吐鲁番出土官府文书、中外文化交流史的研究。他通晓多种外语。治学注意借鉴中外历史学家的经验，重视利用出土文书资料考证中外文献记载。研究重点为西域史地，特别重视研究唐代典章制度和中原文明对西域绿洲国家的影响、唐代以来多民族在西北地区的活动、各种文化在西域汇聚和汇合的过程。主要论着有《大唐西域记校注》、《海舶来天方，丝路通大食──中国与阿拉伯世界历史联系的回顾》、《天涯若比邻──中外文化交流史略》；利用中外各种语言材料考证地名的论文有碎叶城今地考、《唆里迷考》等；区域研究有《唐取高昌国后的西州形势》、《唐代六胡州等地的昭武九姓》、《于阗国的国号、年号及其王家世系问题》、《于阗佛寺志》、《敦煌瑞像图、瑞像记及其反映的于阗》、《和田出土于阗文献的年代及其相关问题》、《敦煌出土于阗文献的年代及其相关问题》等；有关唐代制度和文化交流方面的论文有论唐代的吏、《吐蕃飞鸟使与吐蕃驿传制度》、《隋唐时期中原与西州文化交流的几个问题》、《古代欧亚内陆交通》、《唐代的中外文化汇聚和晚清的中西文化冲突》等。此外还有译着多种。
耶稣和苏格拉底
江苏译林社新近出版了洪佩奇父女联袂编著的《圣经故事》，分“旧约篇”和“新约篇”。特点有二，故事中穿插大量名画，文字详略得当，非常适宜快速浏览。正巧，中央编译社前不久推出美国人米勒和休伯的《圣经的历史》，也是大量名画插图。两书对照阅读，相得益彰。如果手头能有一册黄锡木先生主笔的《圣经通识手册》，再看《（耶稣）受难记》，理解上便不会有太大的困难。
此前，缘于一通电话，找来吴飞先生义疏的《苏格拉底的申辩》，王太庆先生翻译柏拉图《格黎东篇》（通译《克力同》），大嚼了一顿，补上三十多年来的遗憾。我学政治学，也喜欢政治哲学，可柏拉图的两个名篇，此前都不能好好读过。
大家知道，新约圣经，耶稣基督是主角。柏拉图各主题对话，A角是苏格拉底。苏格拉底不用说了，史有其人，但事迹并不详细。耶稣的生平，多少有些可疑，但多数学者和解经家认为，不仅史上确有其人，且行迹如日月般昭彰。
两人生活的年代，差不少，400多年。苏格拉底时代，罗马帝国还未有雏形，耶稣时代，罗马帝国在以色列地已设总督。相隔这么久，两人形迹却有惊人相同之处。他们一生，只一个目标，便是拯救城邦（苏格拉底）和上帝的子民（耶稣），但都因此丧了命。雅典人苏格拉底，被他热爱的城邦公民，投票处死；拿撒勒人耶稣，因以色列人（包括祭司、文士和普通信众）的强烈要求，被钉在十字架上。有趣的是，雅典人控告苏格拉底，跟以色列人指责耶稣，理由如出一辙，就是渎神。雅典人还认定苏格拉底败坏了青年人，以色列人坚称耶稣传道，对罗马帝国的统治，构成威胁。判处耶稣钉十字架，有一细节，罗马总督彼拉多很想为耶稣开脱，释放他，但以色列人说什么也不同意，彼拉多怕引起暴乱，便遵从了他们的意见，遂拿水在以色列人面前洗了手，说“流这个人的血，罪不在我，你们自己承担吧！”这也很符合耶稣自己的意思——他宁可死在以色列人手里。苏格拉底也是，他本来可以不被判处死刑，但他法庭上的两次申辩，激怒了500人团的大部分，“在劫难逃”，他的学生和朋友劝他流亡外邦，他坚拒他们的好意，认为，如果本邦的公民都容不下他，怎么能指望外邦人呢。言外之意，死也死在雅典，——否则他的死，便毫无疑义。
苏格拉底用他自己的特别方式，试图与雅典人一起探讨如何获得智慧，求得真理。耶稣的整个传道工作，从加利利到耶路撒冷，启发以色列人因信称义的道理，核心也是求真。苏格拉底希望雅典人能过上有德性的生活（“不经考察的生活是不值得过的”），关心城邦兴衰大事。耶稣鼓励以色列人信靠上帝，信靠他自己，过有信仰的生活（“不要让酒肉和生活上的忧虑麻痹你们的心灵”）。苏格拉底有德性的生活也好，耶稣有信仰的生活也罢，其基础都是真，是诚实。耶稣最后一次在耶路撒冷的圣殿布道，苏格拉底法庭上最后的申辩，反反复复告诫（痛斥）民（信）众的，就是这一条——你们要诚实，你们已经腐败透顶，应该悬崖勒马。
可是，雅典人和以色列人，已经走火入魔，哪里听得进去！在以色列祭司、文士、民众眼里，在雅典公民的概念中，两人的言行，都不过是蛊惑人心，败坏城邦，亵渎神祗而已！只有将他们处以极刑才能平息民愤。他们果然这么办了。结果是，以色列“大地震动，岩石崩裂”，连圣殿中的幔子也撕成两半儿，40年后，耶路撒冷和圣殿被毁，以色列人背井离乡。雅典法庭处死苏格拉底（前399）后，不到六十年（前338），雅典被马其顿占领，雅典人丧失独立与自由，数百年的光荣不再。
可是，雅典和以色列，希腊、希伯来文化的源头，——整个西方文明的“两希”传统的发祥地，却由这两次无厘头的审判，意外地获得千年拯救。罗马皇帝康斯坦丁执政期间，基督教获得国教地位，以色列人在欧洲找到新的家园。雅典的精神血脉，经过罗马帝国，经过泛希腊化时代，经过文艺复兴，传给现代西方各国，开花结果。或许可以说，西方（包括现代以色列）文明流变传承，根本上得益于两千（多）年前的两次审判，是苏格拉底和耶稣的血，使得西方一代代精英，对公民应过一种德性－诚实（求真）生活，发出不间断追问，——在这不断追问中，西方人展开了他们的近现代文明的画卷。
《圣经故事》洪佩奇、洪叶 编著，译林，2008年6月，32.00元
《苏格拉底的申辩》[古希腊]柏拉图，吴飞义疏，华夏，2007年6月，25.00元
2008年6月17日
